-
Teacher Name: Ernesha Adams
Student Name: ________________________________________
|
CATEGORY
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
|
Content
|
Clear and precise definitions. All information included is correct and relevant.
|
Detailed, clear explanation of descriptive language and definitions.
|
Accurate information with details of figurative language.
|
Correct information is used with minimal errors.
|
|
Examples of Figurative Language
|
Excellent work. At least 10 different examples of various types of figurative language, similes, hyperbole, metaphor, personification, idioms, or sayings. 8-10 types represented.
|
Good work. Some variety and at least 10 examples of figurative language, similes, hyperbole, metaphor, personification, idioms, or sayings. Only 5-7 types represented.
|
Satisfactory work. 10 examples of some type of figurative language, similes, hyperbole, metaphor, personification, idioms, or sayings. Only 3-4 types represented.
|
Unacceptable. Less than 10 examples of figurative language. Only 1-2 types represented.
|
|
Illustrations of Examples
|
Excellent work. Attractive, amusing, well-thought out illustrations of examples. Obvious thought and effort put into illustrations.
|
Good work. Attractive, amusing illustrations of examples. Thought and effort can be seen in the product.
|
Satisfactory work. A good attempt at illustrating examples. Some thought and effort can be seen in the product.
|
Unacceptable. Did not attempt to illustrate examples.
|
|
Explanation of Examples
|
Excellent work. Clear and accurate explanations of examples. Anyone reading the explanations would be able to understand the meaning.
|
Good work. Accurate explanations of examples. Most people reading the explanations would be able to understand the meaning although there may be a few weak points.
|
Satisfactory work. Attempt at explanations of examples. Explanations not clear or lacking in accuracy although some evidence of research.
|
Unacceptable. Did not give explanation of examples or the explanations were inaccurate. No evidence of research.
|
|
Organization
|
Content is well organized using headings and illustrations. Neatly written, readable
|
Uses headings and illustrations. Neatly written, readable organize, but the overall organization of topics appears flawed.
|
Content is logically organized for the most part.
|
There was no clear or logical organizational structure, just lots of facts.
|